The Obama campaign’s response to Geraldine Ferraro’s attack perfectly illustrates several things I talked about last week in The day after. Campaign strategist David Axelrod emphasizes the pattern:
Axelrod said Ferraro’s comments were part of a “pattern” of negative attacks aimed at Obama. He pointed to Clinton’s former New Hampshire co-chairman Bill Shaheen, who questioned whether Obama ever sold drugs; supporter Rober Johnsen, the founder of Black Entertainment Television, who raised the specter of Obama’s past drug use; and Clinton’s own “unwillingness” to “definitively” shoot down rumors that Obama was Muslim in an interview this month.
[All of these, and others, are documented on the Clinton attacks Obama wiki. See, I knew it would be important :-)]
Susan Rice brings up a variant of the “reject and denounce” standard:
“I think if Senator Clinton is serious about putting an end to statements that have racial implications, that diminish Barack Obama because he’s an African-American man,” Rice said, “then she ought to really repudiate this comment and make it clear that there’s no place in her campaign for people who will say this kind of thing.”
And Raw Story’s coverage highlights that the Clinton campaign’s standard responses look insufficient, especially after their call for “vetting” and the reaction to the Samantha Power quote:
Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson, who just last week forcefully called for Obama to fire an adviser who called Clinton a “monster,” said only that the campaign “disagree[d]” with Ferraro, who had not apologized for the remark as of Tuesday afternoon. Aside from Wolfson’s brief statement, Clinton’s campaign remained mostly mum on the Ferraro comments.
Clinton herself did address the dust-up during a brief interview with the Associated Press.
Clinton said, “I do not agree with that,” and later added, “It’s regrettable that any of our supporters — on both sides, because we both have this experience — say things that kind of veer off into the personal.”
Yeah. Regrettable indeed — just like all the other times this happened. As Axelrod said, “When you wink and nod at offensive statements, you’re sending a signal to your supporters that anything goes.”
jon | 12-Mar-08 at 6:33 pm | Permalink
Via Jack and Jill Politics, where Jill Tubman adds
jon | 13-Mar-08 at 9:39 am | Permalink
The Wall Street Journal, Democrats’ Litmus: Electability, January 2007:
Obama and the race card, March 2008:
The rest of the article purports to take a balanced look at whether the Obama campaign is too “sensitive”. They are correct, however, that this bodes ill for the November election — for the McCain campaign, that is, if they try similar garbage.
jon | 13-Mar-08 at 3:06 pm | Permalink
Olbermann: “So the senator wants a clearly racist, clearly equal-opportunity-is-not-a-good-thing, that’s-the-only-reason-he’s-here kind of statement interjected into the campaign?” He’s also not assigning intent to Ferraro — maybe she’s forgotten the flak she got for saying similar things about Jesse Jackson 20 years ago — but making it really clear what he thinks about her statement: intentionally or not, it’s racist.
jon | 13-Mar-08 at 3:18 pm | Permalink
From Joyce Purnick’s Ferraro Is Unapologetic for Remarks and Ends Her Role in Clinton Campaign:
Shouldn’t she have asked herself that a little earlier?
jon | 15-Mar-08 at 10:55 am | Permalink
Jeremiah Wright steps down
Obama blogged about it on the Huffington Post — and the CBN’s Brody File, describing the remarks as “inflammatory and appalling”, and using both the d-word and the r-word:
In the One Million Strong for Barack Facebook group, Harlan G started a thread Isn’t Pastor Wright … right? Great discussion. So is the one on Jack and Jill Politics.
jon | 16-Mar-08 at 11:35 am | Permalink
Obama, quoted in the New York Times:
Excellent and very careful wording by Obama here, consistent with Axelrod’s “pattern” observation above. A friend said a similar thing to me about Bill O’Reilly’s unfortunate “lynching” remark: it probably was based in ignorance, rather than hatred. Many people think it’s not useful to use the word “racist” in situations like this; as in the Ferraro case, it often causes a firestorm.
That’s the great thing about transparency: it’s easy to re-examine the past, and everybody can judge for themselves.
jon | 16-Mar-08 at 4:32 pm | Permalink
Tracy Morgan, on SNL (via RawStory):