It still bugs me that Steve Elliot’s Get FISA Right: Last Chance To Vote Against Domestic Spying was buried by pro-surveillance diggers after I foolishly twittered it to the #tcot (Top Conservatives on Twitter) channel. So when I got Alan Rosenblatt’s email about a new #topprog hashtag, my immediate response was that we should think about how to use it for information diffusion including posts that might be worth digging. Not that I’m competitive or anything ….
Of course as Twitter Vote Report and the Motrin Moms have shown, Twitter hashtags are potentially useful for far more than that. From the Get FISA Right perspective, for example, it’s another great way of broadcasting our dailyish update — and the same’s true for every other grassroots campaign out there.
One especially intriguing aspect of this to me is that Twitter is a far less male-dominated environment than digg, email and the blogosphere — and indeed the early posts to #topprog include @WomenWhoTech, @nerdette, @PunditMom, @myrnathemynx and many others. So it’s a great chance for a key piece of progressive infrastructure where feminists and womanists — and women in general — can participate on a fairer basis.
For an example (and putting my personal competitive issues aside for a second), let’s return to the digg front. Politically, Digg is generally seen as dominated by libertarians and conservatives; from a gender perspective, Jen Nedeau’s two-part series Is Digg Sexist? series on change.org starting with is a good overview (short answer: yes). Suppose that progressives, feminists, and womanists are able to use their Twitter advantage to equalize the situation — and maybe even dominate — on digg. That’d be kind of cool.
Assuming #topprog actually clicks, that is. In addition to overcoming #tcot’s early lead (with a mentor program and a ning already in place), progressives will also have to come up with conventions for how to communicate effectively: hashtags for topics and locations, ways of communicating high-priority information like action alerts, graphical views and other kinds of filters to deal with information overload. It’s all fairly straightforward, but does require collaboration … not always something online progressives are good at.
Still. There’s plenty of research that shows that groups with at least 30-40% women are more effective at collaboration, so a case could be made that it’s far more likely to happen on Twitter than in blog- and email-dominated environments. And there’s plenty of experience in the progressive community from non-partisan projects like Twitter Vote Report. On the whole I’m optimistic.
So check it out! For now the easiest way to get a taste for it is to go to http://search.twitter.com and type in #topprog. If you leave the browser window up, it’ll update you as new posts come in and you can hit refreash.
And if you’re already on Twitter, just add the #topprog hashtag to any posts of yours that are interesting for progressives. Congratulations, now you too are a top progressive!
jon
Update, 5:30 p.m.: R. Stefan Deeran’s Progressives Try to Match Conservatives on Twitter in Exception Magazine quotes Michael Leahy, the Republican strategist behind #tcot:
“We would love to have a dialogue” Mr. Leahy told the Exception. According to Mr. Leahy, Twitter facilitates a decentralized discourse for people on both the left and right.
Indeed. Nancy Scola also covers it in Progressives have a hashtag on techPresident, linking here.
jen | 29-Jan-09 at 2:24 pm | Permalink
thanks for the link – and i agree there could be other areas where progressive/women/etc could reign, but i’m also interested in “fixing” the broken system of Digg and not letting those biases run wild…
thoughts?
jon | 29-Jan-09 at 2:40 pm | Permalink
thanks for the comment, jen,
as i understand it, a few of things that make digg broken are lax moderation policies, arbitrary banning, and the secrecy of the algorithms — and all of those are up to digg itself to fix. of course the best approach would be to get the people running digg to agree to the goal of an unbiased platform and commit to meaningful investment in that direction; i have no idea whether that’s possible.
short of that, a couple ideas of the top of my head. something that proved very useful thing for Get FISA Right is documentation of how to use digg effectively — starting with how to digg, which is not obvious to everybody. it would be great to go beyond that to when to shout and how you shouldn’t do it too often, how to advocate for a story within digg’s guidelines, the techniques that are used to bury stories, “digging guilds”, how to find and engage with “digg magicians”. personally i also think it’s vital to warn people that the comments are filled with racism, sexism, nativism (etc.). also ,other mechanisms like reddit, stumbleupon, yahoo buzz, etc. are useful complements to digg. [quite probably something like this exists already but if so thus far i haven’t found it.]
is that the kind of stuff you’re thinking of?
jon
jon | 29-Jan-09 at 8:18 pm | Permalink
On Stefan’s post, I responded to Michael Leahy’s invitation that #tcot would love to have a dialog:
txvoodoo | 03-Feb-09 at 9:56 pm | Permalink
re: trolling – from a personal level, I’m using Adobe’s TweetDeck as my main twitter app – it provides a running #topprog (or any other search term) column. You can also filter folks in or out of it, to eliminate trolls (once identified). Quite handy.
And YAY for women representing!
Liminal states » Scenarios for #topprog: your thoughts? | 04-Feb-09 at 11:07 am | Permalink
[…] night’s #topprog Tweetup, discussing the next steps for the new progressive Twitter hashtag, had some excellent discussions. Â Chris Cardinal (aka @cacardinal) has set up a skeleton web page […]
jon | 04-Feb-09 at 8:49 pm | Permalink
wow, txvoodoo, TweetDeck is great! thanks much!
Steve Elliott | 05-Feb-09 at 6:24 pm | Permalink
I like the way Jon and everyone having this discussion is turning an initial negative (the #tcot burial of my FISA story on Digg) into a big positive — a plan for effective social media activism and advocacy.
Big props to Jon for his tireless energy and unwavering vision!
#Digg it! A proposal for women of color, feminists, and progressives on Twitter | Reno and Its Discontents | 05-Feb-09 at 8:58 pm | Permalink
[…] in #topprog: yeah, that could work I suggested that if progressives, feminists, and womanists are able to use their Twitter advantage […]
Natch Greyes | 15-Apr-09 at 5:42 pm | Permalink
#topprog is useful but so far I’ve found two problems compared to #tcot
1) It’s longer than tcot and w/only 140 characters that matters
2) It’s not in use as much as tcot and so it’s harder to ‘hijack’ conservative threads on Twitter than conservatives to hijack liberal (progressive) threads.
My example comes from my experience ‘Live Blogging’ the election in NY-20 (you can find that coverage at natchgreyes.blogspot.com) where it was clear conservatives had an advantage on Twitter until late in the day when independents and liberals managed to keep the Twitter chatter under semi-neutral control w/our own chatter.
Actually, the best ‘hijacking’ we’ve done so far is today’s #teaparty. I don’t know who started it but we (progressives) did manage to post quite a few arguments for ‘Why I pay taxes.’
Now, I know ‘hijacking’ threads and ‘flame wars’ aren’t what draw people to Twitter but that’s basically what happens when things get buried on digg. Anyway, I don’t mean by ‘hijacking’ that we should engage in a flame war under hash tags but we do, at least, need to even out the dialog so people w/out particular political persuasion don’t think the conservative voice is the only voice. I typically try to do that through a combination of posts linking to my blog posts on the same subject.
I try to think of it as a strategic advantage. I both garner readers for my blog, exposing more people to progressive thought, and open up a dialog with quite a few people who don’t necessary believe the same things I do. I’ve had more good conversations because of or on Twitter because I’ve posted progressive items to #tcot or other ‘conservative’ hash tags than I care to say.
Obviously, this might not be what you are proposing here but I do agree that it appears lots of women post to #topprog. I really don’t know how the whole internet demographic breaks down but I do know I seem to communicate with more men than women via blogs, email, etc. But, regardless, I wish we had a more cohesive progressive network than currently (it’s hard to find links to blogs you’re interested in & the Twitter support just isn’t there yet)
jon | 01-May-09 at 4:34 pm | Permalink
Natch, my apologies for not having seen your comment earlier. I agree pretty much across the board. #p2 has gotten a lot more traffic than #topprog and the length has a lot to do with it.
The idea for the Why do you pay *your* taxes? counter-demonstration against #teaparty came up at least a couple of places independently; using #p2 and #topprog, we were able to find each other very quickly … I thought we did a great job considering how badly we were outnumbered.
In terms of the more cohesive progressive network, totally agreed. Ideally tweetleft.com will evolve into soemthing even more useful for twitter. More broadly, hard to know how the gap will be filled. Part of why i find Twitter sointeresing is that thanks to the rapid pace, it’s a great place to expeirment. We shall see …
jon